Which of the Following Is Not an Argument for Strategic

question 26

Multiple Choice

Which of the following is not an argument for strategic consistency?

• A)Strategic change can be expensive.
• B)Strategic changes usually fail in the long run.
• C)Consumer confusion may result from strategic change even then the new strategy represents a better fit with the firm's resources.
• D)All of the above are arguments for strategic consistency.

---

Definitions:

Water Molecule

A chemical entity consisting of one oxygen and two hydrogen atoms, connected by covalent bonds, essential for most forms of life.

Electronegativity

A measure of an atom's ability to attract and hold electrons within a chemical bond.

Cations

Positively charged atoms.

Electrons

Subatomic particles with a negative charge, orbiting the nucleus of an atom and involved in chemical bonding and electricity.