The Best Statement of the Test Applied in Determining If

question 116

Multiple Choice

The best statement of the test applied in determining if a defendant was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries is:

• A) Was it foreseeable to the plaintiff that the defendant would engage in this conduct?
• B) Given this particular injury to the plaintiff, was it foreseeable that the defendant was the cause?
• C) Should it have been foreseeable to the defendant that defendant's conduct could lead to this kind of injury?
• D) Was the injury foreseeable to the plaintiff prior to the injury's occurrence?
• E) Was it foreseeable to the plaintiff that this kind of injury could occur under the particular conditions that the injury did occur?

---

Definitions:

Ex Situ Conservation

The practice of conserving animals, plants, or their genetic material outside their natural habitat, as in zoos or seed banks.

In Situ Conservation

The process of protecting an endangered species in its natural habitat, as opposed to ex situ conservation, which involves protecting species by removing part of the population from a threatened habitat.

Biodiversity Hotspot

A region that is significantly rich in biodiversity and is under threat from human activities.

Pattern-matching Techniques

Methods used to compare empirical patterns with predicted ones to increase the validity of research findings.