Which of the Following Was the Result in Baur V

question 47

Multiple Choice

Which of the following was the result in Baur v.Veneman,the case in the text in which the plaintiff sued complaining about the Secretary of Agriculture's policy of certain downed cattle to be used for human consumption on the basis that it increased the risk of contracting mad cow disease?

• A) That the plaintiff lacked standing to challenge the practice because he had not sustained direct injury.
• B) That the plaintiff lacked standing to challenge the practice because he was not a beef producer.
• C) That the plaintiff had standing to sue because he had alleged a credible threat of harm.
• D) That the plaintiff had standing to sue because he had presented substantial proof of verifiable emotional distress that he had already sustained.

---

Definitions:

Inferences

The act of drawing conclusions based on evidence and reasoning rather than explicit statements.

Information Processing Theorist

An information processing theorist studies how human minds process and understand information, focusing on mechanisms like perception, memory, and problem-solving.

Thinking Stops

describes a cessation or significant interruption in the cognitive process, often due to stress, overwhelming information, or mental health issues, preventing effective problem-solving or decision-making.