Which of the Following Was the Result in Pliva,Inc

question 18

Multiple Choice

Which of the following was the result in Pliva,Inc.v.Mensing,the case in the text before the U.S.Supreme Court involving the issue of whether the federal law requirement that generic drugs must bear the same FDA-approved labels as their brand-name counterparts preempts state law claims for failure to warn?

• A) That federal law did not preempt state law claims for failure to warn.
• B) That federal law preempted state law claims for failure to warn.
• C) That federal law preempted state law claims for failure to warn based on strict liability but that failure to warn claims based on negligence could proceed.
• D) That federal law preempted state law claims for failure to warn based on negligence but that failure to warn claims based on strict liability could proceed.

---

Definitions:

Creditor Beneficiary

A third party who benefits from a contract in which the promisor agrees to pay the promisee’s debt.

Public Policy

General principles or ideologies that guide the creation of laws and the operation of government, reflecting the societal values and norms.

Assignment of Rights

The transfer of a party's rights under a contract to another party, allowing them to benefit from those rights.

Assignment

The transfer of rights, property, or obligations from one party to another, often seen in contracts or legal agreements.