What Is the Proper Method of Leading Contrary Evidence to Challenge

question 50

Multiple Choice

What is the proper method of leading contrary evidence to challenge a legal presumption favouring one party?

• A) a rebuttable presumption of the parties' intent to contract
• B) the doctrine of rebuttable inference of refusal to contract
• C) the doctrine of rebuttable assumption of pre-existing condition
• D) a rebuttable promise for which no consideration is given

---

Definitions:

Death Penalty

A legal punishment where a person is executed by the state as punishment for a crime.

Counseling Client

An individual who engages in a professional relationship with a counselor to explore, address, and resolve psychological, personal, and possibly psychiatric issues.

Dualistic Thinkers

Individuals who perceive situations, ideas, and concepts strictly in terms of two opposing categories or perspectives, lacking recognition of nuance or complexity.