In US V White, Involving Incriminating Statements Heard by Law Enforcement Because

question 40

Multiple Choice

In U.S. v. White, involving incriminating statements heard by law enforcement because of warrantless electronic eavesdropping of defendant White's co-conspirator, the Supreme Court held that:
I. White had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his conversation with the co-conspirator.
II. live participant monitoring was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, but
Electronic eavesdropping was not.
III. three-party bugging jeopardizes our sense of security and therefore was unreasonable.
IV. the use of government informants in the respondent's home violated the Fourth Amendment.

• A) I, II
• B) I
• C) I, II, III, IV
• D) III, IV

---

Definitions:

Advertising Costs

Expenses incurred in promoting products, services, or brands through various media channels and platforms.

Brand Awareness

The extent to which consumers are familiar with the qualities or image of a particular brand.

Private Branding

A marketing strategy where a retailer sells products under its own brand name, instead of under the name of a manufacturer.

Store Brands

Products that are manufactured and sold by the retailer under its own branding, typically offered as lower-cost alternatives to national brands.