In US V White, Involving Incriminating Statements Heard by Law Enforcement Because

question 40

Multiple Choice

In U.S. v. White, involving incriminating statements heard by law enforcement because of warrantless electronic eavesdropping of defendant White's co-conspirator, the Supreme Court held that:
I. White had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his conversation with the co-conspirator.
II. live participant monitoring was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, but
Electronic eavesdropping was not.
III. three-party bugging jeopardizes our sense of security and therefore was unreasonable.
IV. the use of government informants in the respondent's home violated the Fourth Amendment.

• A) I, II
• B) I
• C) I, II, III, IV
• D) III, IV

---

Definitions:

Expensive Charges

Costs for services or products that are considered high or above average.

Sexual Harassment

Unwanted sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical harassment of a sexual nature, typically in the workplace or an academic setting.

Canadians

Citizens of Canada or individuals living in Canada, known for their diverse culture and inclusive society.

Work

A task or series of tasks performed to meet a goal or purpose, often to produce goods or services in exchange for payment.