Examlex
Ocala Corp operated a factory that caused corrosive particles to drift in the air and land on a building that was owned by Broderick Inc.Those particles damaged the roof of the building.The damage could have been repaired immediately at a cost of $250 000,but Broderick did not have the money necessary to do so.It therefore sued Ocala in negligence.By the time the trial ended several years later,inflation had run rampant and the cost of repairing Broderick's roof has increased to $900 000.Because of the modern approach to the "thin wallet" rule,Ocala cannot possibly be held liable for more than $250 000.
Indirect Order
A communication technique where important information or bad news is preceded by an explanation or background information.
Direct Order
A command or instruction given with clear and definitive terms, leaving no room for ambiguity or choice.
Introductory Material
Preliminary content that provides background information or an overview of a topic before the main content.
Direct Order
A clear, unambiguous command or instruction to perform an action, often used in military, workplace, or authoritative contexts.
Q10: Copyright includes the right to make copies
Q18: Under Canadian competition law, a private person
Q20: Which of the following explains why the
Q49: Acme Corp is a widget manufacturer that
Q50: Cheyenne committed the tort of battery against
Q61: JB Inc sold a piece of equipment
Q64: Steve, Sheryl's doctor, is selling some of
Q66: Tallal sued Fiona for negligence. She admits
Q109: Information must be just barely sufficient.
Q147: An employee's name and number would be