In Which of the Following Scenarios Would the Doctrine of Binding

question 37

Multiple Choice

In which of the following scenarios would the doctrine of binding precedent NOT apply?

• A)A judge of the Superior Court of Justice of Ontario is hearing a case with similar facts and points of law to a case already decided by the Supreme Court of Canada
• B)The Court of Appeal of Prince Edward Island is hearing a case with similar facts and points of laws to a case already decided by the Supreme Court of Canada.
• C)A judge of the Supreme Court of British Columbia is hearing a case with similar facts and points of law to a case already decided by the Court of Appeal of British Columbia.
• D)The Court of Appeal of Manitoba is hearing a case with similar facts and points of law to a case already decided by a judge of the Supreme Court of British Columbia.
• E)It would apply in all of the above cases.

---

Definitions:

Management's Performance

Evaluation of the efficiency, effectiveness, and attainment of objectives by a company's executives and administrative personnel.

Minority Interests Groups

Groups or entities that hold a minority percentage of ownership stakes in a company and have limited control or influence.

Accrued Expenses

Expenses that have been incurred but not yet paid or recorded by a company, representing obligations that exist at the balance sheet date.

Accounts Payable

Liabilities of a business that represent its obligations to pay for goods or services it has received but not yet paid for.