Examlex
Oracle Attempts to Takeover PeopleSoft
PeopleSoft, a maker of human resource and database software, announced on February 9, 2004 that an increased bid by Oracle, a maker of database software, of $26 per share made directly to the shareholders was inadequate. PeopleSoft’s board and management rejected the bid even though it represented a 33% increase over Oracle’s previous offer of $19.50 per share. The PeopleSoft board urged its shareholders to reject the bid in a mailing of its own to its shareholders. If successful, the takeover would be valued at $9.4 billion. After an initial jump to $23.72 a share, PeopleSoft shares had eased to $22.70 a share, well below Oracle’s sweetened offer.
The rejection prolonged a highly contentious and public eight-month takeover battle that has pitted the two firms against each other. PeopleSoft was quick to rebuke publicly Oracle’s original written offer made behind the scenes to PeopleSoft’s management that included a requirement that PeopleSoft respond immediately. At about the same time, Oracle filed its intentions with respect to PeopleSoft with the SEC when its ownership of PeopleSoft stock rose above 5%. Since then, Oracle proposed replacing five of PeopleSoft’s board members with its own nominees at the PeopleSoft annual meeting to be held on March 25, 2004, in addition to increasing the offer price. This meeting was held about two months earlier than its normally scheduled annual meetings. By moving up the schedule for the meeting, investors had less time to buy PeopleSoft shares in order to be able to vote at the meeting, where the two companies will present rival slates for the PeopleSoft board. Oracle seeks to gain a majority on the PeopleSoft board in order to lift the company’s unique “customer assurance” anti-takeover defense. PeopleSoft advised its shareholders to vote no on the slate of potential board members proposed by Oracle. PeopleSoft also announced that it would buyback another $200 million of its shares, following the $350 million buyback program completed last year.
Oracle has said that it will take $9.8 billion (including transaction fees) to complete the deal. The cost of acquiring PeopleSoft could escalate under PeopleSoft’s unusual customer assurance program in which its customers have been offered money-back guarantees if an acquirer reduces its support of PeopleSoft products. Oracle repeated its intention to continue support for PeopleSoft customers and products. The potential liability under the program increased to $1.55 billion. In addition, Oracle will have to pay PeopleSoft’s CEO Craig Conway a substantial multiple of his current annual salary if he loses his job after a takeover. This could cost Oracle an additional $25 to $30 million. Meanwhile, the Federal Trade Commission is reviewing the proposed acquisition of PeopleSoft by Oracle and has expressed concern that it will leave to reduced competition in the software industry
-Identify at least one takeover tactic being employed by Oracle in its attempt to acquire PeopleSoft. Explain how this takeover tactic(s) works.
Cost of Equity
The return that investors require for investing in a company's equity, reflecting the risk of the investment.
Earnings Per Share
A metric used to determine a portion of a company's profit allocated to each outstanding share of common stock, calculated as net income divided by the number of shares.
Preferred Stock
A class of ownership in a corporation that has a higher claim on its assets and earnings than common stock, often with fixed dividends.
Return on Investment
A measure of the profitability and efficiency of an investment, calculated by dividing the gain from the investment by its cost.
Q23: The leading causes of business failure include
Q25: Speculate as to why the share prices
Q27: Friendly takeovers are negotiated settlements that are
Q37: It is crucial to focus on the
Q43: Earnouts are generally very poor ways to
Q45: There is no limitation on non-U.S. persons
Q58: How would you classify the BofA business
Q63: How might the proliferation of Internet usage
Q151: How did both AMP and AlliedSignal use
Q151: A firm decides to distribute all of