Examlex
Hewlett-Packard Family Members
Oppose Proposal to Acquire Compaq
On September 4, 2001, Hewlett-Packard (“HP”) announced its proposal to acquire Compaq Computer Corporation for $25 billion in stock. Almost immediately, investors began to doubt the wisdom of the proposal. The new company would face the mind-numbing task of integrating overlapping product lines and 150,000 employees in 160 countries. Reflecting these concerns, the value of the proposed merger had sunk to $16.9 million within 30 days following the announcement, in line with the decline in the value of HP’s stock.
In November 2001, Walter Hewlett and David Packard, sons of the co-founders, and both the Hewlett and Packard family foundations, came out against the transaction. These individuals and entities controlled about 18% of HP’s total shares outstanding. Both Carly Fiorina, HP’s CEO, and Michael Capellas, Compaq’s CEO, moved aggressively to counter this opposition by taking their case directly to the remaining HP shareholders. HP management’s efforts included a 49-page report written by HP’s advisor Goldman Sachs to rebut one presented by Walter Hewlett’s advisors. HP also began advertising in national newspapers and magazines, trying to convey the idea that this deal is not about PCs but about giving corporate customers everything from storage and services to printing and imaging.
After winning a hotly contested 8-month long proxy fight by a narrow 2.8 percentage point margin, HP finally was able to purchase Compaq on May 7, 2002, for approximately $19 billion. However, the contentious proxy fight had lingering effects. The delay in integrating the two firms resulted in the defection of key employees, the loss of customers and suppliers, the expenditure of millions of dollars, and widespread angst among shareholder.
-In an effort to combat the proxy contest initiated by the Hewlett and Packard families against the merger, HP's board and management took their case to the shareholders in a costly battle paid for by HP funds (i.e., HP shareholders). Do you think it is fair that HP's management can finance their own proxy contest using company funds while dissident shareholders must finance their effort using their own funds.
Bank Insolvency
A situation where a bank's liabilities exceed its assets, rendering it unable to meet its obligations.
Certificates of Deposit
A savings certificate with a fixed maturity date and specified fixed interest rate that is issued by a bank to a depositor.
Preferred Stock
A class of ownership in a corporation that has a higher claim on assets and earnings than common stock, often with fixed dividends.
Eurobond
An international bond that is denominated in a currency not native to the country where it is issued, offering a way for entities to raise capital in foreign markets.
Q68: To determine which strategy to pursue, the
Q69: The following takeover defenses are generally put
Q75: The timing of a divestiture is important.
Q83: Describe what the likely objectives of the
Q86: Identify at least three criteria that might
Q97: Was Microsoft a good antitrust case in
Q97: Acquiring companies often find themselves with certain
Q101: Which of the following represent common political
Q109: Financial risk refers to the buyer's willingness
Q110: Explain why PeopleSoft's management may have rejected