Examlex
Investors often evaluate a firm’s performance in terms of how well it does as compared to its peers.
Activist investors can force an underperforming firm to change its strategy radically.
The Kraft decision to split its businesses is yet another example of the recent trend by highly diversified businesses to increase their product focus.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Following a successful career as CEO of PepsiCo’s Frito-Lay, Irene Rosenfeld became the CEO of Kraft Foods in 2006. As the world’s second-largest packaged foods manufacturer, behind Nestlé, Kraft had stumbled in its efforts to increase its global reach by growing in emerging markets. Its brands tended to be old, and the firm was having difficulty developing new, trendy products. Rosenfeld was tasked by its board of directors with turning the firm around. She reasoned that it would take a complete overhaul of Kraft, including organization, culture, operations, marketing, branding, and the product portfolio, to transform the firm.
In 2010, the firm made what at the time was viewed by top management as its most transformational move by acquiring British confectionery company Cadbury for $19 billion. While the firm became the world’s largest snack company with the completion of the transaction, it was still entrenched in its traditional business, groceries. The company now owned two very different product portfolios.
Between January 2010 and mid-2011, Kraft’s earnings steadily improved, powered by stronger sales. Kraft shares rose almost 25%, more than twice the increase in the S&P 500 stock index. However, it continued to trade throughout this period at a lower price-to-earnings multiple than such competitors as Nestlé and Groupe Danone. Some investors were concerned that Kraft was not realizing the promised synergies from the Cadbury deal. Activist investors (Nelson Peltz’s Trian Fund and Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square Capital Management) had discussions with Kraft’s management about splitting the firm. This plan had the support of Warren Buffett, whose conglomerate, Berkshire Hathaway, was Kraft’s largest investor at that time, with a 6% ownership interest.
To avert a proxy fight, Kraft’s board and management announced on August 4, 2011, its intention to restructure the firm radically by separating it into two distinct businesses. Coming just 18 months after the Cadbury deal, investors were initially stunned by the announcement but appeared to avidly support the proposal avidly by driving up the firm’s share price by the end of the day. The proposal entailed separating its faster-growing global snack food business from its slower-growing, more United States–centered grocery business. The separation was completed through a tax-free spin-off to Kraft Food shareholders of the grocery business on October 1, 2012. The global snack food business will be named Mondelez International, while the North American grocery business will retain the Kraft name.
Management justified the proposed split-up of the firm as a means of increasing focus, providing greater opportunities, and giving investors a choice between the faster-growing snack business and the slower-growing but more predictable grocery operation. Management also argued that the Cadbury acquisition gave the snack business scale to compete against such competitors as Nestlé and PepsiCo.
-Speculate as to why Kraft chose not to divest its grocery business and use the proceeds to either reinvest in its faster growing snack business, to buy back its stock, or a combination of the two?
Greeks
Refers to the citizens of Greece, their culture, or the ancient inhabitants known for their contributions to art, philosophy, and science.
Electricity
A form of energy resulting from the existence of charged particles such as electrons or protons, manifesting as an attraction or repulsion between those particles.
Total impedance
The overall resistance to the flow of alternating current, combining the effects of resistances, inductive reactance, and capacitive reactance in a circuit.
Applied voltage
The external voltage applied across a component or circuit, causing electric current to pass through it.
Q7: The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Creditor Protection
Q17: Do you believe that it is fair
Q22: Speculate as to the potential circumstances in
Q28: To what extent are the problems plaguing
Q43: Why do boards of directors of both
Q49: The U.S. Securities Act of 1933 requires
Q89: If one party chooses to exit an
Q99: European antitrust policies differ from those in
Q108: Comment on whether antitrust policy can be
Q119: Why do you believe that AT&T chose