Examlex
USX Bows to Shareholder Pressure to Split Up the Company
As one of the first firms to issue tracking stocks in the mid-1980s, USX relented to ongoing shareholder pressure to divide the firm into two pieces. After experiencing a sharp "boom/bust" cycle throughout the 1970s, U.S. Steel had acquired Marathon Oil, a profitable oil and gas company, in 1982 in what was at the time the second largest merger in U.S. history. Marathon had shown steady growth in sales and earnings throughout the 1970s. USX Corp. was formed in 1986 as the holding company for both U.S. Steel and Marathon Oil. In 1991, USX issued its tracking stocks to create "pure plays" in its primary businesses-steel and oil-and to utilize USX's steel losses, which could be used to reduce Marathon's taxable income. Marathon shareholders have long complained that Marathon's stock was selling at a discount to its peers because of its association with USX. The campaign to split Marathon from U.S. Steel began in earnest in early 2000.
On April 25, 2001, USX announced its intention to split U.S. Steel and Marathon Oil into two separately traded companies. The breakup gives holders of Marathon Oil stock an opportunity to participate in the ongoing consolidation within the global oil and gas industry. Holders of USX-U.S. Steel Group common stock (target stock) would become holders of newly formed Pittsburgh-based United States Steel Corporation, a return to the original name of the firm formed in 1901. Under the reorganization plan, U.S. Steel and Marathon would retain the same assets and liabilities already associated with each business. However, Marathon will assume $900 million in debt from U.S. Steel, leaving the steelmaker with $1.3 billion of debt. This assumption of debt by Marathon is an attempt to make U.S. Steel, which continued to lose money until 2004, able to stand on its own financially.
The investor community expressed mixed reactions, believing that Marathon would be likely to benefit from a possible takeover attempt, whereas U.S. Steel would not fare as well. Despite the initial investor pessimism, investors in both Marathon and U.S. Steel saw their shares appreciate significantly in the years immediately following the breakup.:
-Why do you believe USX shareholders were not content to continue to hold tracking stocks in Marathon Oil and U.S.
Steel?
Foreseeability Test
A legal principle used to determine if the harm caused was reasonably predictable as a consequence of an action or omission, impacting liability.
Contributory Negligence
Contributory negligence is a legal concept that can reduce or eliminate the plaintiff's right to recover damages if it is found that the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to the harm suffered.
Actual Damages
A sum of money equal to the real financial loss suffered by an injured party. Also called compensatory damages.
Damages
A monetary compensation awarded by a court to a person who has suffered loss or harm due to the unlawful act or negligence of another.
Q7: What does the reaction of the stock
Q11: A type C reorganization is a stock-for-assets
Q11: Assume a firm's debt to equity ratio
Q12: Which of the following is not true
Q24: Speculate as to how Actavis's takeover of
Q28: What are the important philosophical differences between
Q66: On April 25, 2001, in an
Q82: In globally integrated markets, it makes little
Q112: Which of the following is not true
Q113: Which one of the following is not