Syllogism 1F Given the Following Syllogism

question 242

Multiple Choice

Syllogism 1F
Given the following syllogism:
No nondrinkers are drivers afraid of sobriety checkpoints. Hence, some drinkers are not sober drivers, since some inebriated drivers are not drivers unafraid of sobriety checkpoints.
-For Syllogism 1F, the minor premise is:

• A) No drivers afraid of sobriety checkpoints are drinkers.
• B) All drinkers are drivers afraid of sobriety checkpoints.
• C) All drivers afraid of sobriety checkpoints are drinkers.
• D) Some drivers afraid of sobriety checkpoints are not sober drivers.
• E) All nondrinkers are drivers unafraid of sobriety checkpoints.

---

Definitions:

Trespass To Chattels

Direct, intentional interference with another’s rights to possess his personal property.

Wrongful Interference

An intentional act by one party to disrupt a contractual or business relationship between other parties, causing harm.

Conversion

An intentional tort that involves the unauthorized taking or use of someone else's personal property.

Intentional Tort

A wrongful act done intentionally that causes harm to another person, distinguishable from negligence or accidental harm.