If We Break Down an Argument by Analogy into Two

question 25

Multiple Choice

If we break down an argument by analogy into two steps, first an inductive step and then a deductive step, is the deductive step always valid?

• A)Only if both premises and the conclusion are universal.
• B)Yes.
• C)No, because there might be two negative premises.
• D)No, because there might be an illicit major term.
• E)No, because there might be an undistributed middle term.

---

Definitions:

Non Est Factum

A defense in contract law that allows a person to avoid liability because they were mistaken about the nature of the document signed, not merely its contents.

Unconscionable Transaction

An equitable principle allowing courts to set aside a contract in which a party in a superior bargaining position took advantage of the other party and the consideration was grossly unfair.

Undue Influence

The use of excessive pressure by a dominant party to influence the decisions or actions of another, often undermining their free will.

Equitable Jurisdiction

The authority of a court to decide on cases based on fairness and ethical judgment rather than strictly on laws.