Examlex

Solved

A Statistics Professor Investigated Some of the Factors That Affect y=β0+β1x1+β2x2+β3x3+εy = \beta _ { 0 } + \beta _ { 1 } x _ { 1 } + \beta _ { 2 } x _ { 2 } + \beta _ { 3 } x _ { 3 } + \varepsilon

question 50

Essay

A statistics professor investigated some of the factors that affect an individual student's final grade in his or her course. He proposed the multiple regression model: y=β0+β1x1+β2x2+β3x3+εy = \beta _ { 0 } + \beta _ { 1 } x _ { 1 } + \beta _ { 2 } x _ { 2 } + \beta _ { 3 } x _ { 3 } + \varepsilon .
Where:
y = final mark (out of 100). x1x _ { 1 } = number of lectures skipped. x2x _ { 2 } = number of late assignments. x3x _ { 3 } = mid-term test mark (out of 100).
The professor recorded the data for 50 randomly selected students. The computer output is shown below.
THE REGRESSION EQUATION IS  A statistics professor investigated some of the factors that affect an individual student's final grade in his or her course. He proposed the multiple regression model:  y = \beta _ { 0 } + \beta _ { 1 } x _ { 1 } + \beta _ { 2 } x _ { 2 } + \beta _ { 3 } x _ { 3 } + \varepsilon  . Where: y = final mark (out of 100).  x _ { 1 }  = number of lectures skipped.  x _ { 2 }  = number of late assignments.  x _ { 3 }  = mid-term test mark (out of 100). The professor recorded the data for 50 randomly selected students. The computer output is shown below. THE REGRESSION EQUATION IS   =  41.6 - 3.18 x _ { 1 } - 1.17 x _ { 2 } + .63 x _ { 3 }   \begin{array} { | c | c c c | }  \hline \text { Predictor } & \text { Coef } & \text { StDev } & \mathrm { T } \\ \hline \text { Constant } & 41.6 & 17.8 & 2.337 \\ x _ { 1 } & - 3.18 & 1.66 & - 1.916 \\ x _ { 2 } & - 1.17 & 1.13 & - 1.035 \\ x _ { 3 } & 0.63 & 0.13 & 4.846 \\ \hline \end{array}  S = 13.74 R-Sq = 30.0%.  \begin{array}{l} \text { ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE }\\ \begin{array} { | l | c c c c | }  \hline \text { Source of Variation } & \mathrm { df } & \text { SS } & \text { MS } & \text { F } \\ \hline \text { Regression } & 3 & 3716 & 1238.667 & 6.558 \\ \text { Error } & 46 & 8688 & 188.870 & \\ \hline \text { Total } & 49 & 12404 & & \\ \hline \end{array} \end{array}  Do these data provide enough evidence at the 1% significance level to conclude that the final mark and the mid-term mark are positively linearly related? = 41.63.18x11.17x2+.63x341.6 - 3.18 x _ { 1 } - 1.17 x _ { 2 } + .63 x _ { 3 }  Predictor  Coef  StDev T Constant 41.617.82.337x13.181.661.916x21.171.131.035x30.630.134.846\begin{array} { | c | c c c | } \hline \text { Predictor } & \text { Coef } & \text { StDev } & \mathrm { T } \\\hline \text { Constant } & 41.6 & 17.8 & 2.337 \\x _ { 1 } & - 3.18 & 1.66 & - 1.916 \\x _ { 2 } & - 1.17 & 1.13 & - 1.035 \\x _ { 3 } & 0.63 & 0.13 & 4.846 \\\hline\end{array} S = 13.74 R-Sq = 30.0%.  ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE  Source of Variation df SS  MS  F  Regression 337161238.6676.558 Error 468688188.870 Total 4912404\begin{array}{l}\text { ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE }\\\begin{array} { | l | c c c c | } \hline \text { Source of Variation } & \mathrm { df } & \text { SS } & \text { MS } & \text { F } \\\hline \text { Regression } & 3 & 3716 & 1238.667 & 6.558 \\\text { Error } & 46 & 8688 & 188.870 & \\\hline \text { Total } & 49 & 12404 & & \\\hline\end{array}\end{array} Do these data provide enough evidence at the 1% significance level to conclude that the final mark and the mid-term mark are positively linearly related?


Definitions:

Labor Leaders

Individuals who advocate for the rights and interests of workers, often holding positions of authority within labor unions.

Abuses of Power

Situations where individuals in positions of authority use their power in ways that are unethical, unfair, or harmful to others.

NLRB

The National Labor Relations Board, a US federal agency responsible for enforcing labor laws in relation to collective bargaining and unfair labor practices.

Sentencing Violators

The act of imposing a judicial determination on individuals or entities that have been found guilty of breaking laws or rules.

Related Questions