A Patient with a Heart Pacemaker Received Antibiotic Therapy for Streptococcal

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is The patient's recurring episodes of streptococcal bacteremia, despite antibiotic therapy, suggest that the source of the bacterial infection was not being adequately addressed. In cases where a patient has an implanted medical device, such as a heart pacemaker, there is a risk that the device can become a nidus for infection. This means that bacteria can adhere to the device and form a biofilm, which is a complex aggregation of microorganisms marked by the excretion of a protective and adhesive matrix.

Biofilms are particularly concerning because they can be very resistant to antibiotics. The protective matrix and the altered state of the bacteria within the biofilm can prevent antibiotics from effectively killing the bacteria. As a result, even after antibiotic treatment, the bacteria can persist on the device and re-enter the bloodstream, leading to recurrent infections.

When a patient with an implanted device experiences repeated infections despite appropriate antibiotic therapy, it raises the suspicion that the device itself is infected. In such cases, the most definitive treatment is often to remove the infected device and replace it with a new one. This is because it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to completely eradicate the bacteria from the device with antibiotics alone.

By recommending the replacement of the pacemaker, the physician was targeting the likely source of the recurrent infections. After the infected pacemaker was removed and a new one was implanted, the source of the streptococcal bacteremia was eliminated. This, combined with a course of antibiotics to clear any remaining bacteria from the bloodstream, would have cured the patient's condition by removing both the source of the infection and the infection itself.

It is important to note that the decision to replace an infected pacemaker is not taken lightly due to the risks associated with surgery and the potential complications of the procedure. However, when the benefits of removing a source of persistent infection outweigh the risks, pacemaker replacement becomes a necessary and curative intervention.

A Patient with a Heart Pacemaker Received Antibiotic Therapy for Streptococcal

Definitions: