In the Microsoft Antitrust Case, the Federal Government Said in Essence

question 57

Multiple Choice

In the Microsoft antitrust case, the federal government said in essence that

• A) the mere presence of monopoly violated the Sherman Act, irrespective of Microsoft's behavior.
• B) Microsoft was a "bad monopoly."
• C) Microsoft was generally a "good monopoly" but that its tying contracts involving Internet Explorer violated the Clayton Act.
• D) the case was similar to the U.S. Steel case of 1920.

---

Definitions:

Injury

Harm or damage that is done or sustained, often referring to physical harm caused by accidents, falls, hits, weapons, and other sources.

Illness

A state in which a person's health is impaired, often characterized by symptoms and signs, as a result of infection, genetic defect, or environmental stress.

Consumer Education

The process by which the average person learns to make informed decisions about goods and services, including healthcare.

Good Health

A state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being, not merely the absence of disease.