Examlex

Solved

You Have a Limited Dependent Variable (Y)and a Single Explanatory

question 6

Essay

You have a limited dependent variable (Y)and a single explanatory variable (X).You
estimate the relationship using the linear probability model, a probit regression, and a
logit regression.The results are as follows: Y^=2.8580.037×X(0.007)Pr(Y=1X)=F(15.2970.236×X)Pr(Y=1X)=Φ(8.9000.137×X)(0.058)\begin{array} { c } \hat { Y } = 2.858 - 0.037 \times X \\\quad\quad\quad\quad( 0.007 ) \\\operatorname { Pr } ( Y = 1 \mid X ) = F ( 15.297 - 0.236 \times X ) \\\\\operatorname { Pr } ( Y = 1 \mid X ) = \Phi ( 8.900 - 0.137 \times X ) \\\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad( 0.058 )\end{array} (a) Although you cannot compare the coefficients directly, you are told that "it can be shown" that certain relationships between the coefficients of these models hold approximately. These are for the slope: β^probit 0.625×β^Logit ,β^linear 0.25×β^Logit \widehat { \beta } _ { \text {probit } } \approx 0.625 \times \widehat { \beta } _ { \text {Logit } } , \widehat { \beta } _ { \text {linear } } \approx 0.25 \times \widehat { \beta } _ { \text {Logit } } . Take the logit result above as a base and calculate the slope coefficients for the linear probability model and the probit regression. Are these values close?


Definitions:

Special-Interest Effect

The phenomenon where policy outcomes are influenced by small groups (special interests) who benefit at the expense of a larger group.

Voting Paradox

A situation in collective decision-making where individual preferences do not result in a consistent collective decision, often leading to unexpected or contradictory outcomes.

Freedom to Farm Act

Legislation aimed at reducing government intervention in agricultural markets, emphasizing market-based mechanisms for crop production.

Farm Subsidies

Financial assistance provided by the government to farmers, intended to supplement their income and stabilize food prices.

Related Questions