Examlex

Solved

Build a Regression Model
-Can Happiness Be Predicted? a Researcher

question 65

Short Answer

Build a Regression Model
-Can happiness be predicted? A researcher is investigating whether job satisfaction, income, and health could be good predictors of happiness. She selects a random sample of working adults and obtains the following information for each person. Each person is asked to rate their happiness and their job satisfaction on a scale of 1 to 10 . Each person is asked their annual income. Finally, each person's overall physical health is evaluated by a doctor and rated on a scale of 1 to 20 . The results are shown in the table.
 Happiness  Job satisfaction  Annual Income  (thousands of dollars)  Health 863814654717421912752211233659744144375868241374521433275541051289447\begin{array}{c|c|c|c}\text { Happiness } & \text { Job satisfaction } & \begin{array}{c}\text { Annual Income } \\\text { (thousands of dollars) }\end{array} & \text { Health } \\\hline 8 & 6 & 38 & 14 \\6 & 5 & 47 & 17 \\4 & 2 & 19 & 12 \\7 & 5 & 22 & 11 \\2 & 3 & 36 & 5 \\9 & 7 & 44 & 14 \\4 & 3 & 75 & 8 \\6 & 8 & 24 & 13 \\7 & 4 & 52 & 14 \\3 & 3 & 27 & 5 \\5 & 4 & 105 & 12 \\8 & 9 & 44 & 7\end{array}

(a) Construct the correlation matrix. Is there any reason to be concerned with collinearity?
(b) Find the least squares regression equation y=b0+b1x1+b2x2+b3x3\mathrm { y } = \mathrm { b } _ { 0 } + \mathrm { b } _ { 1 } \mathrm { x } _ { 1 } + \mathrm { b } _ { 2 } \mathrm { x } _ { 2 } + \mathrm { b } _ { 3 } \mathrm { x } _ { 3 } , where x1\mathrm { x } _ { 1 } is job satisfaction, x2\mathrm { x } _ { 2 } is income, x3x _ { 3 } is health, and yy is the response variable "happiness".
(c) Test H0:β1=β2=β3=0\mathrm { H } _ { 0 } : \beta _ { 1 } = \beta _ { 2 } = \beta _ { 3 } = 0 versus H1\mathrm { H } _ { 1 } : at least one of the βi0\beta _ { \mathrm { i } } \neq 0 at the α=0.05\alpha = 0.05 level of significance.
(d) Test the hypotheses H0:β1=0\mathrm { H } _ { 0 } : \beta _ { 1 } = 0 versus H1:β10,H0:β2=0\mathrm { H } _ { 1 } : \beta _ { 1 } \neq 0 , \mathrm { H } _ { 0 } : \beta _ { 2 } = 0 versus H1:β20\mathrm { H } _ { 1 } : \beta _ { 2 } \neq 0 , and H0:β3=0\mathrm { H } _ { 0 } : \beta _ { 3 } = 0 versus H1:β30\mathrm { H } _ { 1 } : \beta _ { 3 } \neq 0 at the α=0.05\alpha = 0.05 level of significance.
Should any of the explanatory variables be removed from the model? If so, which one? Why?
(e) Determine the least squares regression equation with the explanatory variable identified in part (d) removed.
(f) Are both slope coefficients significantly different from zero? If not, remove the appropriate explanatory variable and compute the new least squares regression equation.
(g) How does the P\mathrm { P } -value for your final regression equation compare with the P\mathrm { P } -value for the original equation in part (b)? What does this imply?


Definitions:

Fixed Role Therapy

A therapeutic approach developed by George Kelly, focusing on role-playing and scripting to bring about change in personality.

Undesirable Constructs

Negative or harmful mental models or beliefs that can influence individuals' perceptions and behaviors in adverse ways.

Fictitious Person

An imaginary or non-existent individual often created for storytelling, simulation, or conceptual purposes.

Fixed Role Therapy

A therapeutic approach where clients are encouraged to adopt and act out roles that differ from their typical behavior.

Related Questions