Examlex

Solved

The Following Is an Outline of a Proof That (AB)cAcBc( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c }

question 18

Essay

The following is an outline of a proof that (AB)cAcBc( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks.
 The following is an outline of a proof that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks.  Given sets  A  and  B , to prove that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose  x \in    then we show that  x \in \ldots    . So suppose that   Then by definition of complement,   So by definition of union, it is not the case that (  x  is in  A  or  x  is in  B  ). Consequently,  x  is not in  A    x  is not in  B  because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that  x \notin A  and  x \notin B . So by definition of complement,  x \in \ldots    and  x \in  Thus, by definition of intersection,  x \in   [as was to be shown].  Given sets AA and BB , to prove that (AB)cAcBc( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose xx \in  The following is an outline of a proof that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks.  Given sets  A  and  B , to prove that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose  x \in    then we show that  x \in \ldots    . So suppose that   Then by definition of complement,   So by definition of union, it is not the case that (  x  is in  A  or  x  is in  B  ). Consequently,  x  is not in  A    x  is not in  B  because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that  x \notin A  and  x \notin B . So by definition of complement,  x \in \ldots    and  x \in  Thus, by definition of intersection,  x \in   [as was to be shown].  then we show that xx \in \ldots  The following is an outline of a proof that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks.  Given sets  A  and  B , to prove that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose  x \in    then we show that  x \in \ldots    . So suppose that   Then by definition of complement,   So by definition of union, it is not the case that (  x  is in  A  or  x  is in  B  ). Consequently,  x  is not in  A    x  is not in  B  because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that  x \notin A  and  x \notin B . So by definition of complement,  x \in \ldots    and  x \in  Thus, by definition of intersection,  x \in   [as was to be shown].  . So suppose that  The following is an outline of a proof that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks.  Given sets  A  and  B , to prove that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose  x \in    then we show that  x \in \ldots    . So suppose that   Then by definition of complement,   So by definition of union, it is not the case that (  x  is in  A  or  x  is in  B  ). Consequently,  x  is not in  A    x  is not in  B  because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that  x \notin A  and  x \notin B . So by definition of complement,  x \in \ldots    and  x \in  Thus, by definition of intersection,  x \in   [as was to be shown].  Then by definition of complement,  The following is an outline of a proof that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks.  Given sets  A  and  B , to prove that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose  x \in    then we show that  x \in \ldots    . So suppose that   Then by definition of complement,   So by definition of union, it is not the case that (  x  is in  A  or  x  is in  B  ). Consequently,  x  is not in  A    x  is not in  B  because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that  x \notin A  and  x \notin B . So by definition of complement,  x \in \ldots    and  x \in  Thus, by definition of intersection,  x \in   [as was to be shown].  So by definition of union, it is not the case that ( xx is in AA or xx is in BB ). Consequently, xx is not in AA  The following is an outline of a proof that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks.  Given sets  A  and  B , to prove that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose  x \in    then we show that  x \in \ldots    . So suppose that   Then by definition of complement,   So by definition of union, it is not the case that (  x  is in  A  or  x  is in  B  ). Consequently,  x  is not in  A    x  is not in  B  because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that  x \notin A  and  x \notin B . So by definition of complement,  x \in \ldots    and  x \in  Thus, by definition of intersection,  x \in   [as was to be shown].  xx is not in BB because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that xAx \notin A and xBx \notin B . So by definition of complement, xx \in \ldots  The following is an outline of a proof that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks.  Given sets  A  and  B , to prove that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose  x \in    then we show that  x \in \ldots    . So suppose that   Then by definition of complement,   So by definition of union, it is not the case that (  x  is in  A  or  x  is in  B  ). Consequently,  x  is not in  A    x  is not in  B  because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that  x \notin A  and  x \notin B . So by definition of complement,  x \in \ldots    and  x \in  Thus, by definition of intersection,  x \in   [as was to be shown].  and xx \in  The following is an outline of a proof that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks.  Given sets  A  and  B , to prove that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose  x \in    then we show that  x \in \ldots    . So suppose that   Then by definition of complement,   So by definition of union, it is not the case that (  x  is in  A  or  x  is in  B  ). Consequently,  x  is not in  A    x  is not in  B  because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that  x \notin A  and  x \notin B . So by definition of complement,  x \in \ldots    and  x \in  Thus, by definition of intersection,  x \in   [as was to be shown].  Thus, by definition of intersection, xx \in  The following is an outline of a proof that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks.  Given sets  A  and  B , to prove that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose  x \in    then we show that  x \in \ldots    . So suppose that   Then by definition of complement,   So by definition of union, it is not the case that (  x  is in  A  or  x  is in  B  ). Consequently,  x  is not in  A    x  is not in  B  because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that  x \notin A  and  x \notin B . So by definition of complement,  x \in \ldots    and  x \in  Thus, by definition of intersection,  x \in   [as was to be shown].  [as was to be shown].


Definitions:

Top Executives

Senior-level managers in an organization, responsible for making overarching decisions and setting strategic directions.

Longer Time Perspective

An outlook that emphasizes planning and considering the long-term effects and outcomes of actions rather than focusing solely on short-term gains.

Immediate Problems

Issues or situations that require urgent attention and quick resolution to prevent escalation or further complications.

Situational Variable

Situational variables are external factors that can influence the outcomes of research studies or the effectiveness of strategies, often beyond the control of the participants or planners.

Related Questions