Examlex
Fact Pattern 3-1
Bruce lived in Tennessee and had an appliance store in Tennessee. Bruce's residence and the appliance store, however, were within twenty miles of the Virginia state line. Bruce advertised heavily in both Tennessee and Virginia. Susan, one of his customers from Virginia, had an unfortunate experience with a refrigerator purchased from Bruce in that the refrigerator caught on fire and burned down Susan's house which was worth $200,000. Susan obtained proof that the refrigerator had actually been returned to Bruce because it malfunctioned and that, rather than repair the refrigerator and sell it as used, Bruce sold the refrigerator to her as new without repairs. Susan sued Bruce in federal district court in Virginia on a number of theories. Bruce opposed the lawsuit on the basis that it could only be filed in a state court and also on the basis that he was not subject to jurisdiction in Virginia.
-Refer to Fact Pattern 3-1.Which of the following is the most likely result in regard to Bruce's claim that the lawsuit could only be appropriately filed in a state court?
Electronic Components
Basic physical entities in electronic systems used to affect electrons or their associated fields.
Mechanical Components
Parts or elements that are part of a larger mechanical system, each serving a specific mechanical function.
Software
General term for the programs and operating information used by a computer.
Input Device
is a hardware component used to enter data or commands into a computer or other electronic systems.
Q6: Expenditure-switching policies include currency revaluation,currency devaluation,and direct
Q21: Given a system of floating exchange rates,an
Q21: Set forth the ways described in the
Q34: Based on Exhibit 1.6,which of the following
Q37: Which term best describes the process in
Q38: Spoken defamation is known as:<br>A) libel.<br>B) slander.<br>C)
Q44: According to the text,can an employer be
Q45: The European Union's _ rules are _,so
Q55: For a defendant to be held strictly
Q60: Under the doctrine of _,the plaintiff may