A Two-Factor Study Compares the Effectiveness of Two Different Treatments

question 3

True/False

A two-factor study compares the effectiveness of two different treatments (factor 1)by measuring performance before treatment,immediately after treatment,and 3 months after treatment (factor 2)for each participant.Half of the participants are randomly assigned to treatment A and half to treatment B.The results from this study should be evaluated with an independent-measures two-factor analysis of variance.​

---

Definitions:

Unobservable Actions

Actions taken by individuals or entities that cannot be directly observed or monitored, often leading to issues of information asymmetry.

Moral Hazard

A situation in insurance and economics where one party is more likely to take risks because they do not bear the full consequences of their actions, often due to asymmetric information.

Transaction

An exchange or transfer of goods, services, or funds between two or more parties.

Benefit

An advantage or positive outcome gained from something, often used in the context of employment perks or features of a product or service.