In the Text Case, Lucy Mydlach V

question 72

Multiple Choice

In the text case, Lucy Mydlach v. DaimlerChrysler Corp, the questions at issue were whether the plaintiff could bring a revocation of acceptance claim against a vehicle manufacturer, and when the statute of limitations began to run under the Magnuson-Moss Act. Which of the following was the result on appeal?

• A) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitations under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when the vehicle was sold.
• B) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitations under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when repairs under warranty were not properly made.
• C) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could not be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitations under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when the vehicle was sold.
• D) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could not be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitations under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when repairs under warranty were not properly made.
• E) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could not be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitations under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when the manufacturer was notified that a problem with the vehicle existed.

---

Definitions:

Voidable Contract

A valid contract that can be legally voided at the option of one of the parties.

Delusions

Fixed, false beliefs that conflict with reality, often occurring as symptoms of psychiatric conditions.

Indivisible Contract

A contract that cannot be divided and must be performed in its entirety.

Legal Parts

Essential components or sections of a legal document that determine its validity, structure, and enforceability.