Examlex
[Lake House] Damian has two houses, a house on the lake and a house in town. Frida wants to buy the house on the lake. Damian and Frida orally agree that Frida will buy the house on the lake for $300,000. Damian hurriedly writes out a contract providing that he would sell "his house" to Frida for $300,000. Damian signs the top of the document. Frida does not sign at all. No merger clause is included in the contract. Damian backs out of the contract, and Frida sues him. He tells the judge that the statute of frauds is left unsatisfied because he did not sign the document at the end and also because Frida did not sign at all. He also tells the judge that, at any rate, the agreement referred to the house in town, not the house on the lake; and that under the parol evidence rule, he had the right to identify the correct house.
-Regarding Damian's assertion that the statute of frauds is not satisfied because Frida did not sign the document, which of the following is true?
Q18: Which result is most likely in the
Q20: If an offer authorizes certain means of
Q21: Which of the following would be the
Q30: Which of the following was involved when
Q46: Under the UCC, _ requires that the
Q64: Which of the following is true about
Q70: Toula is buying a delivery vehicle for
Q75: Which of the following is correct regarding
Q80: Only the offeree (or his or her
Q86: How may a party's contractual obligations be