Why Has the Contributory Negligence Defense Been Replaced with a Comparative

question 57

Multiple Choice

Why has the contributory negligence defense been replaced with a comparative negligence theory in most states?

• A) In order to assist a defendant in defending against unfounded claims.
• B) In order to assist a plaintiff in avoiding the assumption of the risk doctrine.
• C) In order to assist a defendant in avoiding the assumption of the risk doctrine.
• D) Because of situations in which a plaintiff is barred from recovery due to minimal contributory negligence.
• E) Because of situations in which a defendant is released from liability based on the last clear chance doctrine when equity requires that the defendant bear at least some responsibility.

---

Definitions:

Bad Debts Expense

Bad debts expense is the cost to a business of accounts receivable that are not collected because customers are unable to pay.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

An accounting provision made for accounts receivable that may not be collectible.

Balance Sheet Approach

A method of estimating allowances and provisions based on the balances of assets and liabilities, rather than focusing primarily on income statement items.

Income Statement Approach

A method of accounting or financial analysis focusing on revenues, expenses, and net income to evaluate a company's performance over a period.