What Does It Mean That Policing During the Reform Era

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is The phrase "policing during the reform era was 'driven by numbers'" refers to a period in law enforcement history where the success and effectiveness of police work were measured primarily by quantitative metrics. This approach to policing emphasizes the importance of statistical data, such as the number of arrests made, tickets issued, stops conducted, and response times, as indicators of police performance and productivity.

During the reform era, which broadly spans the mid-20th century, police departments across the United States and other countries began to adopt more bureaucratic and professional practices. This shift was influenced by the belief that law enforcement should operate more like a business, with a focus on efficiency, accountability, and results that could be quantified and analyzed.

The "numbers-driven" approach had several implications for policing:

1. **Performance Metrics**: Police officers and departments were evaluated based on their ability to meet certain numerical targets. This could include quotas for arrests or citations, which were intended to demonstrate proactive policing and deterrence of crime.

2. **CompStat**: In the 1990s, the New York City Police Department pioneered a management tool called CompStat (short for "Compare Statistics"), which used crime data to identify problem areas and hold precinct commanders accountable for crime rates. This model, which was driven by numbers, spread to other departments and became a standard for measuring police effectiveness.

3. **Resource Allocation**: Data on crime rates and types of offenses were used to allocate resources, such as personnel and equipment, to areas with higher crime statistics. This approach aimed to maximize the impact of police presence and interventions.

4. **Crime Reduction Focus**: The emphasis on numbers often led to a focus on reducing crime statistics as the primary goal of policing, sometimes at the expense of community relations or addressing the underlying causes of crime.

5. **Potential for Misconduct**: The pressure to produce favorable statistics could lead to unethical practices, such as manipulating crime reports, making unnecessary arrests, or engaging in aggressive tactics that strain community-police relations.

6. **Evaluation of Policies**: Numbers-driven policing allowed for the evaluation of specific policies and initiatives based on their impact on crime statistics, which could be used to justify the continuation or cessation of those policies.

While numbers-driven policing brought a level of accountability and focus on results, it also faced criticism for potentially incentivizing the wrong behaviors, neglecting the qualitative aspects of policing, such as community engagement and trust-building, and not adequately addressing the root causes of crime. It's important to strike a balance between using data to inform policing strategies and ensuring that those strategies are implemented in a way that is fair, just, and supportive of the communities being policed.

What Does It Mean That Policing During the Reform Era

Definitions: