Examlex
Suppose a researcher conducted a 2-sided hypothesis test for a population mean (significance level .05) and his test statistic was +1.84.(The significance level was .05.) He knows this test statistic is not large enough to reject the null hypothesis, because the test statistic was not greater than 1.96.Then he realizes that if he had done a one-sided test to begin with (alternative hypothesis ">" ) his results would have been statistically significant, because his test statistic was greater than 1.65.At this point, he decides to change to a one-sided hypothesis test, and reports his results as being statistically significant.Is this acceptable? Why or why not.
Extending Reductions
The process of increasing the scope or duration of cost-cutting or resource-saving measures.
Deep Water Exploration
The process of investigating and exploring the seabed and sub-sea layers in oceanic environments at great depths for resources or scientific research.
Company Profits
The financial gain that a company obtains after deducting all its expenses from its total revenues.
Restructuring
The process of altering the organizational, operational, or financial setup of a company to make it more profitable, efficient, or better organized for its current needs.
Q2: {Bananas narrative} How can the researcher go
Q3: {Side effects narrative} These confidence intervals are
Q6: {Audition qualifications narrative} What is the selection
Q7: A p-value is calculated under the assumption
Q10: No matter what type of population value
Q18: {Test scores narrative} Find and compare the
Q20: Which of the following coincidences reflects a
Q21: Suppose you are conducting a one-sided hypothesis
Q28: How does the relative frequency interpretation of
Q40: {Lottery dollar narrative} This graph has a