Examlex
Suppose a researcher conducted a 2-sided hypothesis test for a population mean (significance level .05) and his test statistic was +1.84.(The significance level was .05.) He knows this test statistic is not large enough to reject the null hypothesis, because the test statistic was not greater than 1.96.Then he realizes that if he had done a one-sided test to begin with (alternative hypothesis ">" ) his results would have been statistically significant, because his test statistic was greater than 1.65.At this point, he decides to change to a one-sided hypothesis test, and reports his results as being statistically significant.Is this acceptable? Why or why not.
Officer
An individual holding a position of command, authority, or responsibility within an organization, especially in a military, corporation, or governmental context.
Ordinary Business Transactions
Everyday activities and operations that are necessary for the running and maintenance of a business.
Formal
Following or adhering to established rules, conventions, or procedures.
Express Authority
Power granted by a principal to an agent through clear, direct communication.
Q5: Meta-analysis can miss detecting results that are
Q6: What is meant by the 'specificity' of
Q10: {Talent and gender narrative}What is the statistical
Q12: Is it possible for the same relative
Q13: Which of these does not apply to
Q13: Suppose Consumer Reports tests a random sample
Q27: Each possible six-number combination of lottery numbers
Q31: Using the relative frequency approach, we can
Q31: Whether or not we can rule out
Q35: Which of the following is the correct