Which of the Following Statements Regarding Katko V

question 31

Multiple Choice

Which of the following statements regarding Katko v.Briney is true?

• A) Katko v.Briney is an example of a criminal appeal.
• B) At the end of the trial, the landowner in Katko v.Briney was found responsible and would have to go to jail.
• C) Katko v.Briney is an example of a civil case.While the trespasser faced a separate criminal proceeding, the landowner did not; he only had to pay damages after the verdict was upheld on appeal.
• D) Because there was a dissenting opinion in the appeal of Katko v.Briney, there will have to be a new trial.

---

Definitions:

Prepaid Expenses

Costs paid in advance for goods or services to be received in the future, treated as assets on the balance sheet.

Accounts Receivable

Sums due to a company from its clients for products or services that have been supplied or utilized but remain unpaid.

Net Income

The residual income of a company after total revenue has been diminished by all costs and taxes.

Cash Flows

The net amount of cash being transferred into and out of a business, especially considered important for assessing liquidity, flexibility, and overall financial health.