Most Political Scientists Have Not Considered Mexico to Be Democratic

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is Most political scientists have not considered Mexico to be fully democratic due to several reasons. One reason is the long history of one-party rule by the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), which limited political competition and marginalized opposition voices. Additionally, there have been concerns about corruption, human rights abuses, and the influence of drug cartels on the political system.

The elections of Vicente Fox in 2000 and Felipe Calderon in 2006 were seen as significant steps towards democratization, as they represented the first time in over 70 years that the PRI did not win the presidency. However, despite these changes in leadership, many political scientists have remained cautious in their assessment of Mexico's democracy. This is because the underlying issues of corruption, human rights abuses, and the influence of drug cartels have persisted, and there have been ongoing challenges to the rule of law and the functioning of democratic institutions.

While the elections of Fox and Calderon represented important milestones in Mexico's democratic development, they were not sufficient to address the deep-seated issues that have historically undermined the country's democratic credentials. As a result, many political scientists are unlikely to change their assessment of Mexico's democracy based solely on these elections. Instead, they will continue to monitor the country's progress in addressing these underlying challenges before revising their evaluation.

Most Political Scientists Have Not Considered Mexico to Be Democratic

Definitions: