Which Court Case Determined That When Officers Act in Good

question 63

Multiple Choice

Which court case determined that when officers act in good faith on a warrant, the evidence will not be excluded even if the warrant was issued improperly?

• A) Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
• B) Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
• C) Nix v. Williams (1984)
• D) United States v. Leon (1984)
• E) Roper v. Simmons (2005)

Gauge the susceptibility of autobiographical memories to inaccuracies.

Apply knowledge of memory research to practical situations such as eyewitness testimony and memory recovery therapy.

Understand the concept of system justification theory and how it explains the acceptance of high-status groups by low-status groups.

Explore the variations in power distance across cultures and its impact on society and workplace dynamics.

---

Definitions:

Compatibility

The degree to which two or more elements are able to exist or work together without conflict.

Discontinuous Innovation

A breakthrough product or service that significantly changes the market or how consumers interact with a market.

Categories Of Adopters

Categories of adopters refer to the classification of individuals within a market divided by how soon they adopt a new product or innovation, often outlined as innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards.

Laggards

In the context of marketing and innovation, individuals who are the last to adopt new products or technologies, often resistant to change.