Examlex
Linda was employed with General Mills in Minnesota for over three years. She was a highly productive employee and was known as the star performer on her team. Due to the economic recession the company had to lay off a large number of employees, and she was one of the employees who was asked to leave without being provided good cause or an explanation. In this scenario, Linda is protected under Section 3(a) of META which says that an:
Non Est Factum
A legal defense claiming a person signed a document without understanding its nature due to a fundamental mistake.
Duress
A situation where a person is forced or compelled to act against their will or to enter into a contract due to threats, violence, or other pressure.
Unconscionability
A legal doctrine that describes terms in a contract that are so unjust or overwhelmingly one-sided that they are deemed unenforceable.
Misrepresentation
A false statement of fact made by one party to another, which induces the latter to enter into a contract or agreement.
Q13: All of the following are direct impacts
Q14: Third party must interfere for an improper
Q38: The freedom of employees to quit the
Q40: The Fair Labor Standards Act (1938):<br>A)sets the
Q45: Employers who are under the HIPAA umbrella
Q47: The Social Security Act (1935):<br>A)sets the ground
Q49: A(n) _ is a set of components
Q54: Discuss the origin of Employee Privacy Rights.
Q71: Ethernet is a network standard that specifies
Q86: When an operating system spends much of