In Exercising Judicial Review, When Reviewing Factual Determinations, the Court

question 17

True/False

In exercising judicial review, when reviewing factual determinations, the court uses one of three different standards: arbitrary and capricious, substantial evidence, or unwarranted by the facts.

---

Definitions:

Ambivalent Sexism

A theory that sexism towards women can be both positive (benevolent) and negative (hostile) and is embedded in societal structures.

External Attributions

Attributions made to factors outside of an individual, such as other people or situational elements, when explaining their behavior.

Ambiguous Qualifications

Credentials or experiences that are unclear or not specific, often leading to uncertainty about someone's suitability for a role.

Job Applicant

An individual who applies for a position within an organization and undergoes the selection process.