Examlex
In considering a covenant not to compete in an employment contract, the court in the case of Payroll Advance, Inc.v.Yates said in its opinion:
Q4: An intended donee beneficiary may enforce the
Q6: Which of the following terms would indicate
Q13: Increased production costs will allow the seller
Q19: The Code has made certain offers irrevocable
Q20: Bargains are illegal if they violate a
Q38: Arnie negligently stopped his car on the
Q40: The Rogers family has always wanted to
Q60: Under the CISG, contracts for the sale
Q61: For rescission to be available as a
Q77: Res ipsa loquitur makes it easier for