Why Are Appeals to the Person Fallacious

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is Appeals to the person, also known as ad hominem fallacies, are fallacious because they do not address the actual argument or evidence presented. Instead, they target the character, motive, or other personal attributes of the person making the argument, rather than the substance of the argument itself. This is a fallacy because it diverts attention from the validity of the argument to the individual presenting it, which is irrelevant to the argument's truth or falsity.

There are several reasons why ad hominem arguments are considered fallacious:

1. **Irrelevance to the Argument's Merit**: The personal characteristics of the individual making the argument have no bearing on the argument's logical coherence or empirical support. An argument should be evaluated on its own merits, not based on who is making it.

2. **Distraction from the Issue**: By focusing on the person rather than the argument, the ad hominem fallacy distracts from the substantive issue at hand. This can prevent a genuine examination of the argument and may lead to the dismissal of valid points.

3. **Avoidance of Engagement**: Engaging in personal attacks can be a tactic to avoid having to engage with the argument itself, especially if the attacker finds the argument difficult to refute on logical or evidential grounds.

4. **Potential for Misjudgment**: Even if the personal criticisms are accurate, they do not necessarily invalidate the argument. A person's character flaws or past mistakes do not mean that their current argument is incorrect.

5. **Circumstantial Ad Hominem**: Sometimes, the fallacy involves attacking a person's circumstances (e.g., their job, background, or affiliations) to discredit their argument. This is fallacious because it assumes that the person is biased or incapable of making a valid argument due to their circumstances, which is not necessarily true.

6. **Poisoning the Well**: This type of ad hominem fallacy occurs when an attack is made on a person's character or reputation in advance, with the intention of discrediting any arguments they might make before they are even presented.

7. **Logical Inconsistency**: If the truth of an argument depended on the person making it, then the argument would have no objective basis. This would lead to logical inconsistency, as the same argument would be true when made by one person and false when made by another, which is an untenable position.

In summary, appeals to the person are fallacious because they do not engage with the actual argument and instead attack the individual, which is irrelevant to the argument's validity. Logical and critical discourse requires that arguments be assessed on their own terms, independent of who is making them.

Why Are Appeals to the Person Fallacious

Definitions: