Examlex

Solved

Refer to the Figure

question 9

Essay

Refer to the figure.
Figure 3
Refer to the figure. Figure 3    Figure 3 shows long-term patterns of continental movement for five large land masses, illustrating the location of the land masses during an active period of land mass movement, at about 40 mya. The arrows indicate the direction of land mass movement and the numbers indicate the approximate timing (mya) of these events. Use the direction of the arrows and the timing of the events to answer the following questions: a) When did land mass 2 split from land mass 4? b) Which land masses joined between 180 and 20 mya? c) Which land masses joined most recently? d) What process could account for the movements of these land masses? Figure 3 shows long-term patterns of continental movement for five large land masses, illustrating the location of the land masses during an active period of land mass movement, at about 40 mya. The arrows indicate the direction of land mass movement and the numbers indicate the approximate timing (mya) of these events. Use the direction of the arrows and the timing of the events to answer the following questions:
a) When did land mass 2 split from land mass 4?
b) Which land masses joined between 180 and 20 mya?
c) Which land masses joined most recently?
d) What process could account for the movements of these land masses?


Definitions:

Comparative Negligence

Comparative negligence is a legal doctrine that reduces the amount of damages a plaintiff can recover in a negligence-based claim, based upon the degree to which the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to the cause of their injury.

Assumption of Risk

A legal doctrine stating that an individual knowingly and voluntarily takes on the risks associated with an activity, relieving others of liability for harm that may result.

Take-Home Exposure

Refers to the transmission of hazardous substances from the workplace to an employee's home, potentially exposing family members to health risks.

Kesner v. Superior Court

A legal case that addressed the issue of duty of care in the context of secondary exposure to asbestos.

Related Questions