Examlex
Michael Davis | Some Paradoxes of Whistleblowing
Davis presents the standard theory of whistleblowing and what constitutes circumstances in which whistleblowing is morally required of an employee. Three paradoxes follow from the standard theory (of burden, of missing harm, of failure) , to which Davis responds with a complicity theory that avoids all of them. He uses the example of the Challenger in demonstrating a test of the latter.
-The paradox of ___________, for Davis, shows that the history of whistleblowing virtually rules out the moral justification of whistleblowing.
Group Means
The average values obtained from the data points of each group or category under examination in a study.
Statistical Significance
Indicating that the observed results are unlikely to occur by chance alone, according to a predetermined threshold of probability.
Null Hypothesis
The hypothesis that there is no significant difference between specified populations, any observed difference being due to sampling or experimental error.
Research Hypothesis
A statement predicting a significant relationship between variables that is tested through research.
Q1: In "Bystander's Three Options," Thomson believes that
Q24: The paradox of _ for whistleblowers, for
Q24: Wolf defines a "moral saint" as a
Q28: In complex cases, a whistleblower must weigh
Q35: Rather than focus on money and capital,
Q49: What does Mill mean by "It is
Q54: A whistleblower should first explore solutions within
Q78: According to _, the obligations of professionals
Q91: Freedman points out that while patients have
Q110: According to Oregon's Death with Dignity Act,