Through Their Replies, It Is Clear That John Corvino Disagrees

question 8

Essay

Through their replies, it is clear that John Corvino disagrees with Ryan Anderson and Sherif Girgis on what must be involved in a discriminatory act for it to be harmful. In your essay, explain the nature of these authors' disagreement, drawing from both of their works. Then, offer an explanation of what type of discriminatory act is involved in a case like Bowman-Cryer's (that Corvino discusses in his essay). Do you think Corvino's or Anderson and Girgis' description of harm best fits this case? Why?

---

Definitions:

Chemical Reaction

A process that leads to the transformation of one set of chemical substances to another, involving rearrangements of atoms and changes in their chemical properties or composition.

Legal Action

A formal proceeding in a court of law where one party sues another for a remedy or relief.

Irreversible State

A condition or situation that cannot be returned to its original state, often used in the context of environmental damage, medical conditions, or irreversible processes.

Manufacturer's Liability

The legal responsibility of manufacturers for any harm caused by defects in their products, regardless of negligence.