Through Dan Lowe's Essay and Spencer Case's Reply, It Becomes

question 4

Essay

Through Dan Lowe's essay and Spencer Case's reply, it becomes clear that the authors have very different understandings of the moral value of the assertion "check your privilege." In your essay, explain their disagreement, drawing from both of their works. Then, explain the extent to which you worry about this particular disagreement. In other words, is Lowe's point worth making even if Case's concern is well-founded? Or is Case's concern strong enough to override the reasons that Lowe gives for the importance of privilege checking?

---

Definitions:

Tibialis Posterior

A muscle in the leg that supports the arch of the foot and aids in walking by controlling plantar flexion and inversion of the foot.

Fibularis Brevis

A muscle of the lower leg that contributes to the eversion and plantarflexion of the foot.

Extensor Hallucis Longus

A leg muscle that extends the big toe and aids in foot dorsiflexion and inversion.

Tibialis Anterior

A muscle in the lower leg that contributes to dorsiflexion and inversion of the foot.