Examlex
Defendant Dan timely filed a motion to suppress evidence at his trial for kidnapping. The trial judge ruled against Dan and allowed the evidence to be admitted into Dan's trial. Dan was ultimately convicted of kidnapping. Dan appeals his conviction based on the admission of the evidence that was the subject of his motion to suppress. What is a possible outcome of Dan's case at the appellate level?
Efficient Outcome
An allocation of resources in which it is impossible to make any one individual better off without making at least one individual worse off.
Marginal Cost
The cost associated with producing one additional unit of output, focusing on how total production costs change with production volume adjustments.
Carbon Tax
A financial charge imposed on greenhouse gas emissions, aimed at reducing carbon dioxide emissions and combating climate change.
Q2: According to the U.S. Supreme Court, probable
Q5: _ occurs when questions are directed to
Q12: A "victim factor" that impacts a victim's
Q21: Alice and Tom meet up with Sam,
Q24: Can other acts evidence be admissible in
Q25: Discuss the key legal developments in the
Q27: To authenticate evidence:<br>A) A witness may identify
Q48: Which of the following statements does not
Q59: The Federal Rules of Evidence limit the
Q59: In the 1961 case Mapp v. Ohio,