Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, Prior Inconsistent Statements Are

question 19

Multiple Choice

Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, prior inconsistent statements are admissible:

• A) When the declarant testifies at trial and is subject to cross-examination about the hearing
• B) When the statement is inconsistent with the witness's current testimony
• C) When the inconsistent statement was given under oath or penalty of perjury at a trial, hearing, other proceeding or deposition
• D) When the witness is given an opportunity to admit, explain the inconsistency, or deny making the statement.
• E) All of the above must occur in order for the inconsistent statement to be admissible.

Address and debunk false objections effectively.

Learn anticipatory objection handling in persuasive communication.

Understand the PAIBOC model and its application in business writing.

Recognize when to implement indirect approaches in communication.

---

Definitions:

Thought-sharing Site

A digital platform where individuals can post their ideas, thoughts, and opinions, often in blog or forum format.

Blog

A web page that contains periodic posts; corporate blogs are a new form of marketing communications.

Mobile Apps

Software applications designed to run on smartphones, tablets, and other mobile devices, catering to various user needs and interests.

Fulfill

To achieve or complete a duty, requirement, or expectation successfully.