Examlex
Henry Sidwick: The Methods of Ethics
In these selections from The Methods of Ethics, Henry Sidwick begins by examining the meaning of moral judgments. What precisely is expressed in saying that some action is "right" or "what ought to be done"? Sidwick rejects the view that moral judgments merely affirm the existence of feelings of approval and disapproval toward certain kinds of conduct and then gives his own view on the matter, namely that notions like "right" and "ought" are too elementary to admit of definition or analysis into more basic terms.
Sidwick next turns to the question of moral cognition. How do we arrive at reasoned moral judgments about what actions are right and ought to be done? Sidwick considers three methods for doing so. According to the first, egoistic hedonism, right conduct always coincides with the course of action that produces the most happiness (or least pain) for ourselves. Sidwick, however, argues that external and internal sanctions are insufficient to guarantee such a perfect coincidence between prudential self-interest and moral, pro-social behavior. Sidwick then considers philosophical intuitionism, according to which right conduct is determined by rationally self-evident moral principles that can be directly intuited in reflection. Sidwick finds this method wanting as well because although he acknowledges that some such principles exist, they are too abstract and general to guide action in particular cases.
Lastly, Sidwick considers utilitarianism, which of the three methods has the most to recommend it in his view. For one, utilitarianism largely supports the familiar rules of commonsense morality. But utilitarianism also improves commonsense morality by providing a precise guide to action when commonsense moral rules are ambiguous or vague, in conflict with one another, or in need of qualification. Although utilitarianism has these features to recommend it, Sidwick recognizes that it faces serious questions and challenges as well. For example, there is the question of whether utilitarianism must take into account the welfare of non-human beings as well as future generations, and, if so, how their welfare can enter into hedonistic calculations with sufficient precision. Perhaps the most pressing question is whether it is wrong, from a utilitarian point of view, to advocate openly for utilitarianism.
-Sidwick claims that moral terms like "right" and "ought" are:
Financial Capitalism
An economic system where financial markets play a critical role in determining the allocation of capital, the pricing of assets, and the management of economic risks.
Industrial Capitalism
An economic and social system in which trade, industry, and capital are privately controlled and operated for profit.
Fossil-fuel
Natural fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas, derived from the remains of living organisms and used primarily for energy.
Industrial Order
A social and economic system characterized by the large-scale industrial production and management of goods and services, often associated with the rise of factories and mechanization.
Q6: Grace<br>A) Buddhist or Hindu notion of liberation
Q6: In Aristotle's view, the virtues are:<br>A) acquired
Q6: According to Gauthier, a moral practice is
Q13: Epictetus claims if an event is not
Q15: Sidwick claims that moral notions like "right"
Q17: According to Augustine, evil:<br>A) diminishes our admiration
Q19: When thinking about questions of right and
Q20: Gauthier claims that we must accept the
Q22: Augustine claims that human beings were made:<br>A)
Q27: According to Williams, direct consequentialism holds that