Examlex
G. E. Moore: Principia Ethica
According to G. E. Moore, the fundamental task of moral philosophy is to provide a definition of goodness. In seeking a definition, Moore is not simply trying to discover what it is that most people mean when they say the word good, nor does he aim to stipulate his own novel definition. Rather, he seeks to give an account of the nature of goodness by analyzing the concept in terms of its component parts, much as one might define bachelor as an unmarried man. According to Moore, however, "good" cannot be defined in this sense. This is because the concept of goodness is simple-it has no parts. Moore claims that in this respect "good" is like "yellow": You cannot explain what the concept is to someone who does not already know it.
Moore argues that many previous philosophers have failed to recognize this point, and in doing so have committed what he calls the naturalistic fallacy, the mistake of believing that goodness is identical to some natural property, such as happiness or that which we desire. (Elsewhere, Moore uses a discipline definition of "natural" as a property that is appropriately studied by those working on the natural sciences.) Against any such identity claim, Moore deploys what has become known as the open question argument. For any proposed definition of good, Moore claims, it is always sensible to ask whether things of that sort are good. For instance, the question "Is pleasure good?" appears to be a perfectly sensible question to ask - it is an open question. In contrast, the question "Is pleasure pleasant?" is trivial - it is a closed question. According to Moore, this proves that goodness and pleasure cannot be the same thing. Moore holds that this test can be used to disqualify any proposed definition of goodness, and thus goodness cannot be identical with any natural property.
-According to Moore, the most fundamental question in all of ethics is:
Exclusive Jurisdiction
A situation in which only a particular court has the power to adjudicate a case to the exclusion of all others.
Procedural Rules
Regulations or guidelines that govern the procedures to be followed in court proceedings or other formal processes.
Federal Court
A judicial tribunal established by the United States government, with authority derived from the Constitution and federal laws, to adjudicate disputes that involve national statutes, constitutional issues, and other matters within federal jurisdiction.
State Court
A court that has jurisdiction over disputes pertaining to state laws and constitutions.
Q1: According to Sidwick, utilitarians generally agree that
Q4: According to Cicero, any defect known to
Q18: According to Augustine, a person who never
Q25: Nagel claims that almost nothing about what
Q26: Aristotle claims that virtue is:<br>A) necessary and
Q27: What is Nagel's explanation of why we
Q27: According to Cicero, there is nothing so
Q30: Scanlon calls values that are not tied
Q31: In the text and in class, we
Q32: Herman believes that Kant accepts:<br>A) the "battle