Examlex
A. J. Ayer: Language, Truth, And Logic
Ayer's logical positivism motivates his view on ethics, an empiricist approach to philosophy that was prevalent during the first half of the 20th century. Logical positivists thought that all significant statements could be divided into analytic and synthetic propositions. Analytic propositions are true (or false) solely in virtue of the meanings of the terms involved (e.g., "All bachelors are unmarried") . All propositions that are not analytic are synthetic. According to logical positivists, all synthetic statements are empirical hypotheses; that is, claims about actual or possible experiences. If a statement is neither analytic nor an empirical hypothesis, logical positivists maintain that it is meaningless.
Ayer considers several influential ethical theories: subjectivism, utilitarianism, and "absolutism" (the intuitionism of philosophers like Moore and Ross) . Against subjectivism, Ayer claims that it would not be self-contradictory to say that some actions that are approved of are not right. Similarly, Ayer argues against utilitarianism by claiming that it is not contradictory to claim that it is sometimes wrong to do an action that would cause the greatest happiness. Ayer objects to absolutism on the grounds that it makes ethical claims empirically unverifiable, as different people have different intuitions about which acts are right or wrong. In light of this, Ayer claims that ethical statements are literally meaningless: They do not assert genuine propositions and are neither true nor false. Instead, that ethical statements serve the function of expressing our emotions, and of arousing similar feelings in others. Because on this view there is no truth in ethics, Ayer contends that it is impossible to argue about questions of value. We can try to persuade people to share our emotional reactions to things, but we cannot prove that our values are uniquely correct. Rather, "argument is possible on moral questions only if some system of values is presupposed."
-Ayer claims that a synthetic proposition is significant only if it is:
Adjusting Events
Events after the balance sheet date that provide further evidence of conditions that existed at the end of the reporting period, requiring adjustments to financial statements.
Non-Adjusting Events
Events after the reporting period that do not provide new information about conditions existing at the end of the reporting period.
AASB 108
The Australian Accounting Standards Board standard outlining the procedures for making accounting policy changes, correcting errors, and making estimates.
Q2: Epictetus recommends that we refrain from:<br>A) laughing
Q7: Smart claims that when we perform the
Q8: What does it mean to say that
Q15: Cicero claims that what is just is
Q19: What would it mean to deny that
Q20: The original position is best conceived of
Q23: What is a prima facie duty, and
Q23: According to Epictetus, what disturbs our minds
Q24: Nagel claims that moral luck is a
Q31: Why does Stevenson think that goodness is