Examlex
A. J. Ayer: Language, Truth, And Logic
Ayer's logical positivism motivates his view on ethics, an empiricist approach to philosophy that was prevalent during the first half of the 20th century. Logical positivists thought that all significant statements could be divided into analytic and synthetic propositions. Analytic propositions are true (or false) solely in virtue of the meanings of the terms involved (e.g., "All bachelors are unmarried") . All propositions that are not analytic are synthetic. According to logical positivists, all synthetic statements are empirical hypotheses; that is, claims about actual or possible experiences. If a statement is neither analytic nor an empirical hypothesis, logical positivists maintain that it is meaningless.
Ayer considers several influential ethical theories: subjectivism, utilitarianism, and "absolutism" (the intuitionism of philosophers like Moore and Ross) . Against subjectivism, Ayer claims that it would not be self-contradictory to say that some actions that are approved of are not right. Similarly, Ayer argues against utilitarianism by claiming that it is not contradictory to claim that it is sometimes wrong to do an action that would cause the greatest happiness. Ayer objects to absolutism on the grounds that it makes ethical claims empirically unverifiable, as different people have different intuitions about which acts are right or wrong. In light of this, Ayer claims that ethical statements are literally meaningless: They do not assert genuine propositions and are neither true nor false. Instead, that ethical statements serve the function of expressing our emotions, and of arousing similar feelings in others. Because on this view there is no truth in ethics, Ayer contends that it is impossible to argue about questions of value. We can try to persuade people to share our emotional reactions to things, but we cannot prove that our values are uniquely correct. Rather, "argument is possible on moral questions only if some system of values is presupposed."
-Ayer claims that a strictly philosophical treatise on ethics should:
Diffusion of Responsibility
A socio-psychological phenomenon whereby a person is less likely to take responsibility for action or inaction when others are present.
Urban Apathy
A state of indifference and lack of concern among city dwellers towards their community and surroundings, often attributed to overstimulation and perceived powerlessness.
Six-person Juries
A group of six individuals selected to deliberate and make decisions in a legal case, smaller than the traditional twelve-member jury.
Cohesive
Describes a group or material that sticks together tightly, often used to describe a team with strong bonds and unity.
Q1: To decide whether there are reasonable grounds
Q1: In Prichard's view, intrinsic goodness of an
Q3: According to Epicurus, it is better to
Q6: Aquinas holds actions are differentiated by:<br>A) their
Q7: Kant claims that the moral law is
Q7: Why are some people horrified by existentialism,
Q15: Butler claims that every human being is
Q18: According to Nietzsche, the values of "good"
Q28: According to Dewey, desires are matured by:<br>A)
Q29: According to Williams, consequentialists claim that everything