Examlex
C. L. Stevenson: The Emotive Meaning of Ethical Terms
Stevenson claims that before we can hope to answer ethical questions, we must first try to understand exactly what is being asked. In light of this, he examines the question: what does it mean to call something good? According to interest theories, to say that something is good is simply to say that it is approved of or desired, either by the speaker or by some group of people. Stevenson denies that such theories can fully capture what it means to call something good, and sets out to provide a more satisfying theory. He claims that any such theory must account for three things: (i) people may sensibly disagree about what is good, (ii) goodness has a "magnetism" in that judgments about goodness motivate us to act, and (iii) claims about goodness are not empirically verifiable. Stevenson believes his theory, emotivism, meets these requirements. According to emotivism, ethical claims are not simply attempts to describe the world, but are primarily used to influence others. As Stevenson puts the point, "ethical terms are instruments used in the complicated interplay and readjustment of human interests."
Stevenson maintains that ethical terms have emotive meanings, in the sense that they tend to produce affective responses in people. We use these emotive meanings to try to influence others to approve or disapprove of certain things. Thus, on Stevenson's view, to claim that something is good is both to express one's own approval of the thing, as well as to encourage one's audience to join in approving of it. Moral disagreements are therefore not mere disagreements in belief, in which one person believes a proposition and the other one disbelieves it. Rather, in ethical disagreements, one person has a favorable attitude toward something, whereas the other has an unfavorable attitude, and neither is content to let the other's attitude remain.
-Stevenson claims that "Ethical claims are social instruments." What does he mean by this? Do you agree with this claim? Why or why not?
Zero Coupon Interest Rate
A rate of interest reflecting the discount from par at which zero-coupon bonds are sold. This rate is not paid annually but at maturity.
Arbitrage Profit
Profit earned from buying and selling the same asset in different markets to take advantage of differing prices for the same asset.
Stock Index
A measurement of a section of the stock market calculated from the prices of selected stocks, representing a specific market or sector.
Futures Contracts
Financial contracts obligating the buyer to purchase an asset or the seller to sell an asset, such as a physical commodity or a financial instrument, at a predetermined future date and price.
Q4: Smart claims that, for the extreme utilitarian,
Q6: Despite its rejection of aggregation, Scanlon claims
Q20: When it comes to defining good, Moore
Q24: According to Foot, for an action to
Q25: According to consequentialism, the right action is
Q26: Ayer maintains that moral statements are expressions
Q27: On Sidwick's view, moral judgments simply affirm
Q29: In Ross's view, there is only one
Q29: Sartre claims that everything is permissible if
Q30: Smart claims that if restricted utilitarianism introduces