Examlex
R. M. Hare: Freedom and Reason
Hare argues that moral judgments are universalizable and prescriptive. That is, he claims that to genuinely make a moral judgment, one must be willing to universalize that judgment-if you claim that another person ought not do x, you must also be willing to admit that you ought not do x if faced with the same circumstances. Furthermore, he maintains that moral judgments are characteristically prescriptive, such that making the judgment "I ought to do x" involves (among other things) accepting the prescription "Let me do x."
Given these two features of moral judgments, Hare develops a theory of moral reasoning that parallels scientific reasoning. Like scientific reasoning, moral reasoning involves assessing general principles by attempting to falsify their particular consequences. While scientific hypotheses can be falsified only by actual observations, however, Hare claims that moral principles can be reasonably rejected on the basis of merely supposed cases. Thus, to test the principle "creditors always ought to imprison their debtors," we need not find a case that contradicts the principle; it is sufficient if we can imagine a case in which a creditor ought not to imprison a debtor.
In Hare's view, moral reasoning involves four necessary ingredients: (i) a knowledge of all the relevant facts of the case, (ii) an appreciation of the logical framework provided by the constraints of universalizability and prescriptivity, (iii) a set of inclinations, and (iv) the power to imagine what it is like to be in the shoes of others. To discover what we morally ought to do, we must ask whether we would be able to universalize the principles we are inclined to accept. Hare concludes by considering how one might try to escape from the type of moral arguments he advocates. He concludes that although we can often rationally persuade others to adopt our moral views, it might be impossible, even in principle, to do so when dealing with people who have very unusual inclinations.
-Hare claims that the two essential features of the logic of moral judgments are:
Nurture
The process of caring for and encouraging the growth or development of someone or something.
Scientific Research
The systematic investigation of scientific theories and hypotheses through controlled experiments and observational studies to acquire new knowledge.
Objective
Something that is not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts.
Testable
The quality of being able to be examined, experimented on, or evaluated through a careful and structured process.
Q3: Bentham claims that nature has placed mankind
Q3: According to Mill, to call an action
Q9: According to Korsgaard, intuitionists do not believe
Q10: Aquinas claims that:<br>A) pleasure exists for its
Q14: Augustine claims that the logical rule that
Q16: Annas claims that learning to be moral
Q20: The original position is best conceived of
Q25: Anscombe claims that an adequate moral psychology
Q29: In Ross's view, there is only one
Q31: Anscombe maintains that Aristotle provides an adequate