Examlex
R. M. Hare: Freedom and Reason
Hare argues that moral judgments are universalizable and prescriptive. That is, he claims that to genuinely make a moral judgment, one must be willing to universalize that judgment-if you claim that another person ought not do x, you must also be willing to admit that you ought not do x if faced with the same circumstances. Furthermore, he maintains that moral judgments are characteristically prescriptive, such that making the judgment "I ought to do x" involves (among other things) accepting the prescription "Let me do x."
Given these two features of moral judgments, Hare develops a theory of moral reasoning that parallels scientific reasoning. Like scientific reasoning, moral reasoning involves assessing general principles by attempting to falsify their particular consequences. While scientific hypotheses can be falsified only by actual observations, however, Hare claims that moral principles can be reasonably rejected on the basis of merely supposed cases. Thus, to test the principle "creditors always ought to imprison their debtors," we need not find a case that contradicts the principle; it is sufficient if we can imagine a case in which a creditor ought not to imprison a debtor.
In Hare's view, moral reasoning involves four necessary ingredients: (i) a knowledge of all the relevant facts of the case, (ii) an appreciation of the logical framework provided by the constraints of universalizability and prescriptivity, (iii) a set of inclinations, and (iv) the power to imagine what it is like to be in the shoes of others. To discover what we morally ought to do, we must ask whether we would be able to universalize the principles we are inclined to accept. Hare concludes by considering how one might try to escape from the type of moral arguments he advocates. He concludes that although we can often rationally persuade others to adopt our moral views, it might be impossible, even in principle, to do so when dealing with people who have very unusual inclinations.
-Hare claims that moral principles that suggest themselves to us by our:
Impairment Loss
A recognized reduction in the recoverable amount of an asset, indicating that its market value has dropped below its book value on the balance sheet.
Double-Declining-Balance
A method of accelerated depreciation which doubles the regular depreciation amount.
Capitalize Development Costs
The accounting practice of adding the costs associated with developing a new product or service to the balance sheet as an asset, rather than expensing them.
Research Costs
Expenses related to the investigation and discovery of new knowledge that could be useful for the development of new products or services.
Q8: Rawls conceives of the original contract as
Q10: What reasons does Gauthier give for his
Q13: According to Arpaly, the degree to which
Q14: Nagel claims that the primary object of
Q14: According to Hume, whatever is produced by
Q18: What two models of moral sainthood does
Q19: Stevenson thinks that "good" means "desired by
Q22: Hume claims that reason is sometimes sufficient
Q25: Sidwick suggests that utilitarians should extend their
Q26: Anscombe claims that the expression morally ought