John Rawls: a Theory of Justice

question 4

Essay

John Rawls: A Theory of Justice
The social contract theory, which has roots in Plato and was developed by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, and Kant, grounds moral requirements in social agreements made for the sake of mutual advantage. Rawls presents a novel social contract theory, which has two main parts. The first part of the theory identifies the correct principles of justice as those "that free and rational persons concerned to further their own interests would accept in an initial position of equality as defining the fundamental terms of their association." To ensure that the principles selected by contractors are fair, Rawls imposes a crucial restriction on the "original position" from which the contractors select principles. In Rawls's theory, the correct principles of justice are those that would be chosen from behind a veil of ignorance, whereby individuals are stripped of any particular knowledge about themselves, their social position, or their conception of the good. In putting forward this idea of the original position, Rawls claims that he is simply making vivid "the restrictions that it seems reasonable to impose on arguments for the principles of justice."
Rawls maintains that contractors in the original position would agree on two principles of justice. First, "each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive scheme of equal basic liberties compatible with a similar scheme of liberties for others." Second, "social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both (a) reasonably expected to be to everyone's advantage, and (b) attached to positions and offices open to all." The first of these principles is lexically prior to the second - i.e., the first principle (concerning liberty) trumps the second (concerning inequality). The guiding thought behind the two principles, Rawls claims, is that inequalities can be just only when they benefit the least advantaged members of society. Rawls points out that his theory thus differs sharply from utilitarianism, according to which we ought to maximize well-being, and shares commonalities with Kant's moral philosophy.
-Rawls states, "Injustice, then, is simply inequalities that are not to the benefit of all." Do you agree with this claim? Why or why not? How does this conception of injustice manifest itself in Rawls's theory?

---

Definitions:

Intramuscular Injection

A method of delivering a medication deep into the muscles, allowing the drug to be absorbed into the bloodstream quickly.

Warm Compress

A therapeutic method involving the application of a warm, wet cloth to various parts of the body to relieve pain, decrease inflammation, and improve blood flow.

Warfarin

A medication used as an anticoagulant to prevent blood clots from forming or growing larger in the blood and blood vessels.

Incident Report

A detailed account of an unexpected event, especially one leading to injury or harm, used to improve safety.